Monthly Research Digest

Every month's ABA research, read and summarized.

The Signal collects the new behavior-analytic literature across the field's journals and turns it into a curated, searchable digest — structured metadata, practical summaries, and direct links to each abstract and full text.

Plans from $5.99 / month
Cancel any time
New issue every month

Three plans, monthly to yearly. Secure checkout through Stripe.

Pick a plan and create your account

Same full access on every plan — longer terms cost less per month. Checkout is handled by Stripe.

Create your account
One account, one login. You'll set your payment method on the next step through Stripe.
Required
Required
Enter a valid email address
At least 8 characters
Payments processed securely by Stripe. We never see your card details.
Already subscribed?
Plan—
Billing—
Effective rate—
Charged today—

Renews automatically at the same rate. Cancel any time from your account — access continues to the end of the paid period.

Log in
Welcome back. Pick up where you left off.
Enter a valid email address
Required
No account yet?
Reset your password
Enter the email on your account and we'll send a link to set a new password.
Enter a valid email address
Check your email
You're subscribed
You'll stay signed in on this device. A new issue is added every month.
01
Every journal, every month

The month's new behavior-analytic research, gathered across the field's journals and grouped by publication. July's issue: 51 articles across six journals.

02
Summaries you can act on

Each article gets a plain-language summary written for practice — what was studied, what was found, and what it means for your work.

03
Search, filter, and follow the link

Filter by journal or access type, search the whole issue, and open the abstract or full text directly. Free, BACB-resource, and subscription articles are labeled.

Journals
Behavior Modification6
Behav. Res. & Therapy7
Behavioral Disorders5
Behavioral Interventions17
Access
✦ Free ★ BACB ⊘ Sub
BM ✦ Free
Response interruption and redirection for stereotypy: A quality review and ethical considerations
MacNaul H, Nguyen A

This systematic review examined the methodological quality and ethical context of response interruption and redirection (RIRD) research for reducing stereotypy. Across 42 articles and 277 cases, only 9% met What Works Clearinghouse design standards without reservations, while 44% met standards with reservations and 47% did not meet standards. Among cases eligible for evidence review, 67% showed strong or moderate evidence of a functional relation. The findings suggest that practitioners considering RIRD should establish a clear treatment need, conduct appropriate functional assessment, ensure high-fidelity implementation, and incorporate client preferences and social validity into intervention decisions.

One of 51 entries in the July 2026 issue.

Start with this month's issue

Create your account, choose a plan, and the current issue opens as soon as payment clears. Every following month lands the same way.

See pricing & sign up
Cancel any time. Payments handled by Stripe.